Introduction
As an entrepreneur, I have made many mistakes and I will write about them in due time. Out of the numerous mistakes I made, three in particular almost devastated the company I co-founded. Today we will talk about one of those mistakes.
The objective of this story is not Mounir but the decisions and lessons that we share that many entrepreneurs could be facing.
My personal background
From 1984, the time of my first assignment as an assistant engineer, until 2005, I was either studying or mostly working in various roles, initially in engineering but since 1990 in project management roles — but — on industrial projects (technical). During this period I managed projects, I was involved in process improvement initiatives, among other things.
In 2004, a few friends and I launched SUKAD. In 2005 I left Saudi Aramco (with more than 50,000 employees) to lead a start up with one employee – yours truly. My wife joined me as part time and a colleague’s wife joined me on part time basis as well. In 2006, we had our first full time employee.
The points from above to reflect on later are: (a) technical degrees, (b) project management roles but in technical environment, and (c) large or huge organizations.
SUKAD and my role
We started SUKAD because we saw a gap – an opportunity – for project management training and consultancy in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC consists of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, and Bahrain). The gap was not limited to GCC but spread across West Asia in general.
As an entrepreneur, with a start-up, we did realize that I needed to do all, from cleaning and filing to delivering high-end consultancy for large clients and conglomerates. However, the big question that was haunting us from the beginning, especially as we start to have full time staff, is the following: “should Mounir focus on leading the company and deliver services – and/or manage the company?” What does this question mean? Let me elaborate on the roles:
- As a leader, I have to keep my eyes on the vision, strategic direction, among other long-term objectives and mid-term strategy to ensure SUKAD grow and deliver on its mission.
- As a manager, I have to worry about marketing, sales, accounting, audit, licensing and registration, hiring and visa issues, staff management, among other details.
- As a consultant, I work with clients, deliver consultancy services, conduct training, develop courses, in addition to leading our research and development program.
In the early days, I had to wear the multiple hats, in addition to being the janitor. Yet, the question kept coming back, especially as SUKAD was growing.
In our mind at the time, it would not make sense to continue with the multiple hats … one role would be ideal but if we must then two, three or more and we lose focus. With that mindset, we explored our options:
- We could replace Mounir as a consultant, but that would not be good since Mounir has valuable global expertise to share. Further, many clients insist on Mounir to deliver services to them. Then this option was out!
- Could we replace Mounir as the leader? That was not possible since Mounir is the drive behind this organization and the only partner with significant expertise in project management. This would be possible if we shift our strategy to being commercially driven instead of customer-centric (this can be a long discussion). Then this option was also out!
- We could replace Mounir as a manager. This was possible, funding permitted, and that would free Mounir to focus on items (1) and (3). Further, Mounir (I) do not like to manage. That does not means I could not (or I am not) a decent or good manager … I just do not like to manage, especially in a small company environment. The decision – find another manager for SUKAD.
The mistake
As a small company – wanting to grow – especially in a booming market (UAE / GCC market was booming between 2005 and 2008) we decided in the summer of 2008 to act on the decision above and bring in an “operation manager” to take the lead for all of SUKAD operating activities while Mounir focus on leadership and professional services. The idea was – within a year, that person would also become the CEO to free me of other day-to-day business.
Why was that a mistake?
For many reasons:
- The company was still too small to sustain a senior manager or even a CEO replacement
- We had limited funds and the salary of a senior manager is substantial on a small service provider
- In a small company – with the founder still involved – it is very difficult to let go
- The person we hired – highly qualified – PhD – etc. did not fit our culture and from the start there were too many conflicts
- The final factor – is external – this person mobilized at the end of 2008 – just in time when a global crisis was sweeping the globe and Dubai (where our offices) was hit hard
- There was another internal factor – not specific to the decision that contributed to making the situation more difficult.
Looking back, the main mistake was that we let emotions be the main factor in the decision making and not smart business planning. What we mean is the following: although there were good justifications to bring in an operation manager, especially with Mounir being more valuable to SUKAD as a leader and consultant than a manager; the decision was flawed. Further, Mounir (I) not liking to manage was a major driver. The problem was in not performing proper analysis of all the risks and performing good business analysis to justify the position.
Our keen drive to avoid “management” led us to repeat the same mistake again in 2011. The circumstances were different but the underlying drivers continued to be – that I should focus on leading and consulting instead of managing. For various factors, the move in 2011 also failed.
The lessons
After failing twice – repeating the same mistake – and almost bankrupting the company we learned our lessons. So we shifted our focus, we accepted that I should balance leadership and management while limiting my consultancy and training work as much as possible. With valuable team members in place now, we are able to count on them to manage pieces of the work instead of replacement to Mounir. That does not mean we are not looking for a successor but the next time, the business has to be strong enough to sustain such a move and possibly from inside SUKAD someone can step up to take the leadership role.
The moral
I would probably write articles that are more specific about entrepreneurship in the future and cover successes and failures. For now, the moral is that people with passion for something – whatever that is – often rush into launching a business without truly understanding what it takes. Another point is to take time to understand our decisions and their consequences – negative or positive.
On a related note, the entrepreneurship ecosystem, at in least in West Asia and other developing regions/countries, is still weak and does not provide enough support. In recent years, there is a push for entrepreneurship and the word entrepreneur is becoming trendy and cool, almost in a negative way sometime. Therefore, we think the risk on people is higher since due of the hype they might jump into business because it is fashionable rather than because they are, ready and fully understand what lies ahead.
More to come – in due time.
In the meantime – do you have a story to share? We would love to hear it and publish it if there are good lessons to learn.
Mounir, thank you for sharing your story (and challenges). I have been in Non-Profit Management for 30 years. Then began my own consultancy firm for management/leadership development, strategic planning and growth management. I have a couple observations about your situation…
First, what you experienced is pretty common for new entrepreneurs. Most of us are good at what we do, then we are thrust into a management role which is not a natural skill. it is one that needs to be developed. It does takes valuable resource investment for a small start-up, so the decision is a difficult one. We live or die by our hiring choices. A bad hire could damage a company (as you found out).
Secondly, successful Management is all about getting the right people on board (“on the bus”), and in the right role (“in the right seat”). Great managers lead, develop and support the staff of the organization/company. I would contend that non-profit managers do this a little better than for-profit companies because they tend to be more people oriented and are used to working in a limited resource environment (little disposable money).
Lastly, when you do decide to try this again, make sure you are clear on the role, job description, company vision and mission, and your strategic goals. Interview your candidates searching for their fit to these areas and you will make a good hire.
Please contact me if you’d like (john.cocciolone@gmail.com), but I look forward to your updates.
Good luck and best wishes for your company.
John.
Dear John
Thank you for the valuable feedback and time to write … we also appreciate the advice
Hello Mounir
Thanks for articulating your thought process and lessons learned. What impressed me was the honesty and objectivity with which you analyze your experience.
Thanks
Shashi
thank you … we will be sharing more personal lessons learned in the future
Thank you very much for sharing your valuable experience
Dear Mr. Mounir,
This inspirational article strikes a chord with the readers as it echoes the struggles and difficult decisions that great companies face in the early stages.
I find it ironic that even a Project Management company can face situations that cannot be anticipated. By the way, I am an Accidental PM and still coming to grips with the PM concepts and way of thinking.
I feel your decision to opt out of being an ‘accidental Manager’ (if I may borrow that term) wasn’t a mistake. It was rather the person you hired was overqualified and perhaps not versatile enough to wear different hats – from admin to accounts. The job title ‘operations manager’ too may have contributed to the situation but I could be wrong.
I would like to hear your thoughts on whether the concept of PM also involves analyzing ‘what-if’ scenarios during the planning stage? If so, to what extent.
By the way, I am already half-way thru your brilliant book, The Inheritance, a copy of which was presented to me by Mr. Houssam when I visited your offices last week!
Dear Mr. Hussam
Thank you for your contribution and comment here on this personal post.
In regard to your questions on whether the concept of PM involves ‘what-if’ scenario. Yes, absolutely. We use what-if in many circumstances, especially as we plan the project. Scheduling is an area requiring asking what-if many time. As we work toward completing our project plans, we perform risk management assessments and risk management is an extensive / comprehensive exercise in uncertainty and anticipating what could happen – what-if scenarios.
I am glad, you are enjoying The Inheritance. Since you like it and if you want to get more in-depth knowledge on the CAM2P model, please visit our knowledge portal eBooks section for our project management series – they are available for download with our compliments.
Very significant to read the entrepreneur point of view when it comes to the challenges faced.
Even better – is to live it 🙂