In the previous article, we discussed how The Customizable and Adaptable Methodology for Managing Projects™ differs from the PMBOK® Guide, specifically, in the area of planning. The main point was that there should be two plans instead of 1, one for management and one for the details.
In today’s discussion, we will focus on the management planning processes which lead to the Stage Management Plan. In these article we will address the detailed planning processes, leading to the Stage Detailed Plan.
PMBOK® Guide Perspective
As discussed already [previous article], there are ten management planning processes; out of the twenty four in the planning process group. There is one management planning process for each knowledge area. These include “Plan Scope Management”, “Plan Risk Management”[1], and the others. For a listing of these processes, please refer to the PMBOK® Guide.
Please note that the PMBOK® Guide does not separate the processes into two parts; the split is by the author.
CAM2P™ Perspective
Alternatively, per the CAM2P™ standard model, management planning consists of:
- The ten management planning processes from the PMBOK® Guide,
- Other management plans from the PMBOK® Guide but that do not have dedicated processes for them, such as configuration management, process improvement, and change management.
- Other planning processes that are not in the guide, such as safety, health, environmental, sustainability, and others that might be domain specific.
The above are the primary components of the CAM2P™ Stage or Project Management Plan.
All the stages’ management plans are somewhat similar and focus on the work of the given stage, whereas the project management plan is higher level and is for the whole project. Some of the above plans might not be applicable on certain projects; a function of the project domain.
The table below presents the template for a typical stage management plan.
Notice, the structure is somewhat different than the PMBOK® Guide but does cover all of the subsidiary management plans mentioned earlier.
Although there are many components, a stage management plan could be quite simple, especially in organizations where there are mature project management practices and an effective organizational project management system. In other words, most of the elements below could be a line or a few lines at most[2].
Project |
Stage |
How to Develop the Stage Detailed Plan |
How to Execute and Manage the Stage Work |
How to Control the Stage |
How to Handle Change During the Stage |
How to Close the Stage |
Stage Management Team |
Stage Planning Team[3] |
Initial Project Life Span[4] |
[1] All references to the PMBOK® Guide or the names of the processes is per the PMBOK® Guide 5th Edition is copyrights – all rights reserved – to PMI.
[2] The other Sections of this e-book will include examples.
[3] The team members that will develop the stage detailed plan. They could be the same people as the stage management team or include the stage management team and a few subject matter experts.
[4] This would be required only in the first stage, the project pre-launch stage and will be superseded when the project management plan is developed during the project launch stage.
This comment was posted on LinkedIn Leadership in Project
Management group by Stéphane Parent,
https://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=3737709&item=5965744781689643012&type=member&commentID=discussion%3A5965744781689643012%3Agroup%3A3737709&trk=hb_ntf_COMMENTED_ON_GROUP_DISCUSSION_YOU_CREATED#commentID_discussion%3A5965744781689643012%3Agroup%3A3737709
I’m not sure how much benefit there is in spawning a Stage Management Planning methodology. As the article points out, it is part of the overall PMM. It could easily reside in the overall project management plan, especially as there is probably a lot of
repetition across the stages.
We are not proposing a Stage Management Planning methodology as an independent methodology from managing a project. This article and the one before it (plus one more to be published) are to highlight the differences between management planning process and detailed planning process … and that there should be two plans – not one like what the PMBOK Guide proposes.
Further, in a project life cycle (span) model, the PM Plan is not developed at the start. For example, during the project concept phase or feasibility study, there is no PM Plan yet, but we still have to manage the stage, hence the need for this stage management plan and stage detailed plan.
Mounir
This comment was posted on LinkedIn Leadership in Project Management group by SUKAD Group,
https://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=3737709&item=5965744781689643012&type=member&commentID=discussion%3A5965744781689643012%3Agroup%3A3737709&trk=hb_ntf_COMMENTED_ON_GROUP_DISCUSSION_YOU_CREATED#commentID_discussion%3A5965744781689643012%3Agroup%3A3737709
We are not proposing a Stage Management Planning methodology as an independent methodology from managing a project. This article and the one before it (plus one more to be published) are to highlight the differences between management planning process and detailed planning process … and that there should be two plans – not one like what the PMBOK Guide proposes. Further, in a project life cycle (span) model, the PM Plan is not developed at the start. For example, during the project concept phase or feasibility study, there is no PM Plan yet, but we still have to manage the stage, hence the need for this stage management plan and stage detailed plan.
Mounir
This comment was posted on LinkedIn Leadership in Project Management group by Stéphane Parent,
https://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=3737709&item=5965744781689643012&type=member&commentID=discussion%3A5965744781689643012%3Agroup%3A3737709&trk=hb_ntf_COMMENTED_ON_GROUP_DISCUSSION_YOU_CREATED#commentID_discussion%3A5965744781689643012%3Agroup%3A3737709
Thank you for the clarification, Mounir. In my mind, I am still applying regular project
management processes to each stage, including initiation: plan, execute,
control and close. As you point out, they are simply more detailed.
Why not treat the feasibility study as a project on its own? Why does it have to be a stage?